PROJECT TITLE:
How does semantic richness impact the processing of word meaning across different languages?
Responsible researcher: Dr Simon De Deyne [email protected]
Peshala Dissanayake Graduate Diploma in Psychology (Advanced) [email protected]
Thank you for your interest in participating in this experiment. Please read this Plain Language Statement carefully to decide whether you would like to take part in this research project. If you have any questions regarding the experiment, please feel free to contact Peshala Dissanayake ([email protected]).
Your participation is completely voluntary. It is your choice whether to take part, and if you wish to withdraw midway, you are free to do so without facing any consequences.
The goal of this study is to investigate whether semantic meaning can be considered constant across languages, or rather that differences in semantic richness (e.g. how many things/features we know about a particular word) between languages affects semantic meaning.
You will first be asked to answer demographic questions. This is followed by a task that judges your semantic understanding of words, in which you will be asked to choose whether a word is more “concrete” or “abstract” in meaning. Finally, you will then complete a task in which you will judge the relatedness of words. In this task, you will be presented with three words, one cue word and two word prompts. You will be asked to choose which of the two word prompts is more strongly related to the cue word. The survey data will be collected online, with the estimated time commitment for both tasks being 30 minutes in total.
The research will expand the existing knowledge surrounding variability in semantic richness across languages. Specifically, it will provide data on how native speakers in different languages respond to semantic judgements tasks, and whether this is linked to the level of semantic complexity and richness of their linguistic group. As part of the University of Melbourne Research Experience Program (REP), you, as the participant, will receive 0.5 course credits
The research will expand the existing knowledge surrounding variability in semantic richness across languages. Specifically, it will provide data on how native speakers in different languages respond to semantic judgements tasks, and whether this is linked to the level of semantic complexity and richness of their linguistic group. Participants who finish the task will receive £6.
There are minimal risks involved in this study. The words presented will all be common and non-sensitive words. There are no advantages or disadvantages in participating in this project other than to accrue hours of credit and the inherent benefits of experiencing the research project.
There are minimal risks involved in this study. The words presented will all be common and non-sensitive words.
We will endeavour to protect your confidentiality as best we can, subject to limits of the law. Your consent form will be kept separate from your data. The data will be identified by participant ID only and will not contain your name. Only the researchers involved in this study will be able to link your data to your name. Data from this study will be stored in a password protected system (OneDrive) owned by the research team and made available only to the researchers listed at the top of the Plain Language Statement. The raw data will be stored for 5 years. The summary data will also later be made available online for research related and/or unrelated to the current study, again in de-identified form. As a result, consenting to this study entails also consenting to collected information being shared and potentially used in further, unrelated research. In any publication of the information, privacy and confidentiality will be protected through the use of de-identified data.
No, participation is entirely voluntary. If you wish to withdraw at any point in the experiment, you will not be penalised. The data for incomplete studies will not be stored, and therefore will not be used for analysis. However, please note that REP points will not be awarded for any incomplete participations.
No, participation is entirely voluntary. If you wish to withdraw at any point in the experiment, you will not be penalised. The data for incomplete studies will not be stored, and therefore will not be used for analysis. However, please note that you need to finish the task to receive payment.
The results of this research may be published in conference presentations and research papers which will be made available through the lab webpage (https://psychologicalsciences.unimelb.edu.au/chdh/about). Following completion, you will be provided with a debriefing form summarising the aims of the project.
If you would like more information about the project, please contact the researchers: Dr Simon De Deyne ([email protected]), or Peshala Dissanayake ([email protected]).
This project has human research ethics approval from The University of Melbourne (Project ID: 29592) If you have any concerns or complaints about the conduct of this research project, which you do not wish to discuss with the research team, you should contact the Research Integrity Administrator, Office of Research Ethics and Integrity, University of Melbourne, VIC 3010. Tel: +61 3 8344 1376 or Email: [email protected]. All complaints will be treated confidentially. In any correspondence, please provide the name of the research team and/or the name or ethics ID number of the research project.
I consent to participate in this project, the details of which have been explained to me, and I have been provided with a written Plain Language Statement to keep. I understand that the purpose of this research is to investigate how differences in semantic richness across different languages affect meaning.
Click "Proceed" to voluntarily consent to the above and participate in this study.
Please contact Peshala Dissanayake ([email protected]) to help you troubleshoot this problem.